Tickline News

Space digest — Oct 25, 2026

Space · ← Oct 24, 2026 · Oct 26, 2026 →

Top line: AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile have jointly asked the FCC to strip 290 MHz of mid-band spectrum out of the plan that lets satellites serve ordinary phones — the first coordinated carrier counterattack against SpaceX's direct-to-cell build-out, landing days before the commission's planned October 29 vote on a direct-to-device spectrum auction. Ukraine is disputing Elon Musk's claim that its military violated Starlink's terms of service, even as President Volodymyr Zelensky confirms Starshield operations are back at normal speed. At Starbase, SpaceX has confirmed a full-duration 33-engine static fire for Starship Flight 15's Booster 22 ahead of the targeted November 8 launch, with new reporting putting Starship's Florida debut — Flight 16 — and a possible Roberts Road expansion in motion.

  1. US carriers ask the FCC to cut 290 MHz from the satellite spectrum plan
  2. NASA's two-lander Artemis IV plan: Starship and Blue Moon work differently on the same mission
  3. Ukraine disputes Musk's Starlink terms claim as Starshield speeds restore

3 stories · 13 in brief

US carriers ask the FCC to cut 290 MHz from the satellite spectrum plan

US carriers ask the FCC to cut 290 MHz from the satellite spectrum plan
AI image

Continuing thread: space — SpaceX as a US carrier: Starlink Mobile gets FCC clearance

Sources Shattered

What happened: AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile have asked the FCC to drop 290 MHz of 2.5 GHz and 3.45 GHz spectrum from its supplemental coverage from space plan, Shattered reports in coverage published in the early hours of October 25, Eastern. That plan is the regulatory framework that lets satellite operators transmit directly to standard phones.

What's genuinely new: The three largest US mobile carriers are now on the docket as coordinated opposition, a material pushback against a spectrum plan that had so far only moved in SpaceX's favor — the FCC cleared the Starlink Mobile application on October 6 (up to 15,000 next-generation satellites, plus a waiver to serve phones without going through a traditional wireless carrier), and SpaceX separately bought roughly $8 billion of low-band spectrum that Musk called the last critical piece of the spectrum puzzle. Mid-band 2.5 GHz and 3.45 GHz holdings are the workhorse frequencies for carrier 5G ground networks. The filing lands four days before the FCC's scheduled October 29 vote on a direct-to-device spectrum auction.

Watch: The October 29 FCC vote; whether the FCC entertains the carve-out or the carriers escalate (litigation-grade filings, congressional letters); and how the outcome reshapes the Starlink Mobile service plan, whose FAA environmental review is already docketed separately.

NASA's two-lander Artemis IV plan: Starship and Blue Moon work differently on the same mission

Continuing thread: space — Artemis hardware cadence: II fix validated, III stacking, IV flow

Part of: Arc · The next crewed Moon landing

Sources Starlust

What happened: NASA's plan to fly both landers on Artemis IV — the Moon landing mission targeted for 2028 — contains major changes, and SpaceX and Blue Origin will use different operational methods for Starship and Blue Moon during that single mission, Starlust reports on October 25.

What's genuinely new: The operational distinction between the two landers within one mission — not just that both fly, but how their roles differ in the revised profile. It lands against a revised campaign in which NASA has said it will not choose between the SpaceX and Blue Origin landers until Earth-orbit test results are in (reported October 24), with uncrewed lunar landings by both targeted for early 2028, and the broader Apollo-urgency frame of a Moon base and landings "in as little as two years" that the wire coverage carried October 24.

Watch: The specifics of each lander's operational method as NASA details them; whether the 2028 Artemis IV landing target survives its own test schedule; and the uncrewed landing demonstrations that gate the final selection.

Ukraine disputes Musk's Starlink terms claim as Starshield speeds restore

Continuing thread: Starlink in the Ukraine war: drone throttling and the Starshield access dispute

Sources Click Orlando Yahoo News

What happened: Ukrainian officials have disputed Elon Musk's claim that their military violated Starlink's terms of service by using the network for offensive purposes, Click Orlando reports on October 25. In its October 25 war-day roundup, Yahoo News adds that President Volodymyr Zelensky has confirmed Starshield operations are running at normal speed again, and that Musk named an alleged terms violation as the reason for the service disruptions.

What's genuinely new: The dispute now has both sides named: Musk's accusation — an alleged terms-of-service violation as the stated cause of the Starshield slowdowns — and Ukraine's official denial of it, capped by Zelensky's confirmation that speeds are restored. It lands against a storyline spine built through October 14–19: Ukrainian officials' drone-throttling allegations, Reuters reporting that the order to throttle Starshield for Ukraine came from the White House, battlefield terminals throttled to 160 km/h with drones losing guidance, and Musk's October 19 statement attributing any speed or usage limits ("decided by the US military") to the US military rather than to himself.

Watch: Whether SpaceX, the US military or the White House addresses the terms-violation claim and who set the limits; what "normal speed" means for the 160 km/h figure; and whether the restored service settles the dispute or the denial escalates it.

Brief

← Oct 24, 2026 Oct 26, 2026 →